"MM" <kylix_is@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:15fvr2hm6sbjos4ps9v068di0jguqre35e@4ax.com...
> On 30 Jan 2007 14:50:04 GMT, "Alex" <no.spam@mail.com> wrote:
> 
> > At 14:05:34 on 30/01/2007, MM delighted uk.legal by announcing:
> > 
> > > 
> > > So because ours are not up to the standard of the Dutch and Germans,
> > > we should ignore our cycle paths?
> > 
> > No.  We should ignore them because they are unfit for purpose.
> 
> What, *all* of them?

No the ones which are unfit for purpose. For example
those with a great big tree in the middle of it every 10 yards,
Only negoriable by trick cyclists at low speeds.


> 
> MM