On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:11:51 -0000, "Dr Zoidberg"
<alexNOOOOOO!!!!!!!@drzoidberg.co.uk> wrote:

> Maria wrote:
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6261791.stm
> > 
> > Violent offender 'Asbos' planned
> > 
> > The government is planning "behaviour orders" for people considered to
> > be at risk of committing a violent crime.
> > 
> 
> "If there's evidence that you could commit a violent offence in the future,
> proper evidence of that proved in a court, then why shouldn't you be
> restrained from committing that violent offence. "
> 
> Well that violent offence is already against the law. Are the sort of people
> they have in mind likely to suddenly be less violent because it's now
> against a *different* law?
> 
> 
> 
> "We are willing to do it relation to Anti-social Behaviour Orders, why not
> in relation to other sorts of offences as well."
> 
> Because in the case of ASBOs they *have* already committed these types of
> actions and are having it re-iterated that they shouldn't do so.
> The proposed law seems to be "we think you might commit a crime"

It's all very "Minority Report".

BB
-- 

http://www.kruse.co.uk/internet-marketing-small-business.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-tips.htm