"MM" <kylix_is@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:vd4ur2hu9n8itcca0thjb1qo384b7qo8l7@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:00:25 GMT, "Tate and Lyle" <me@invalid.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > "Alex" <no.spam@mail.com> wrote in message
> > news:52606qF1mojdbU1@mid.individual.net...
> > > At 11:04:45 on 28/01/2007, MM delighted uk.legal by announcing:
> > > 
> > > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:16:43 +0000, Simon Dean
> > > > <sjdean@simtext.plus.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > 
> > > > If there was a cycle lane, he should have used it.
> > > 
> > > Nonsense.
> > 
> > Technically the road is a cycle lane thus he has a choice.
> 
> Do you see Dutch or Germans cycling on the highway when there is ample
> cycle path provision? No, because the Dutch and the Germans are
> sensible people. We are idiots who just like confrontation for the
> sake of it.

They have proper cycle lanes, ie good surface and on both sides of the 
roads.
u really think I am going to cross the road twice to get to my destination?

Yes the Dutch and the Germans are sensible people because they have proper 
cycle lanes.
We are the idiots because we don't build they properly and then try to blame 
the
cyclist like the cheap hyporites the British are. Stuff that up your cycle 
lane.




> 
> MM